U.S. intelligence reports warn of extremist threat around election


U.S. security officials are warning that violent domestic extremists pose a threat to the presidential election next month, amid what one official called a “witch’s brew” of rising political tensions, civil unrest and foreign disinformation campaigns.

FBI and U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) memos say threats by domestic extremists to election-related targets will likely increase in the run-up to the Nov. 3 election.

Those warnings so far have largely remained internal. But New Jersey’s homeland security office took the unusual step of publicly highlighting the threat in a little-noticed report on its website last week.

“You have this witch’s brew that really hasn’t happened in America’s history. And if it has, it’s been decades if not centuries,” said Jared Maples, director of the New Jersey Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness, which published the threat assessment.

Nationwide protests in recent months over racial justice and police brutality have been largely peaceful, but some have led to violent confrontations, including between extremist factions from left and right.

Documented cases of mail-ballot fraud are extremely rare and election experts say it would be nearly impossible for foreign actors to disrupt an election by mailing out fake ballots.

A recent internal FBI bulletin warned that domestic extremists with varying ideologies would likely pose an increasing threat to government and election-related targets in the run-up to the election, according to a person familiar with it. The bulletin was first reported by Yahoo News.

A DHS memo dated to Aug. 17 said ideologically driven extremists and other actors “could quickly mobilize” to engage in violence related to the election. The document, also first reported by Yahoo News, was confirmed to Reuters by a person familiar with it.

The memo said that lone offender white supremacists and other lone offenders with “personalized ideologies” pose the greatest threat of deadly violence.

Trump officials have pointed the finger at left-wing anarchists and anti-fascists during protests against police brutality and racism over the summer, but federal court records provide little evidence showing those arrested for violent acts had affiliations to far-left groups.

Last week, the top two DHS officials acknowledged in congressional hearings, however, that white supremacists have posed the most lethal domestic threat to the United States in recent years.

FBI Director Christopher Wray said during congressional hearings earlier this month that his agency was conducting investigations into violent domestic extremists, include white supremacists and anti-fascist groups. He said the largest “chunk” of investigations were into white supremacist groups.

White supremacist, anti-Semitic, anti-government, and related ideologies were tied to 77 percent of 454 alleged domestic extremist murders in the past decade, according to data compiled by the Anti-Defamation League, a New York City-based anti-hate advocacy organization, and presented at one of the congressional hearings last week.

The New Jersey report outlines three possible scenarios for the November election: a quick election outcome, a protracted process where determining a winner takes months and a legal battle that eventually goes to the Supreme Court.

Each of the scenarios could lead to extremist violence, with the possibility of deadly confrontations between protesters and targeted violence toward police officers, the assessment concludes.

The agency’s report says the extremists will likely be “anarchist, anti-government, and racially motivated,” but does not say which groups pose the greater threat.

The domestic extremist threat has always been present, but is getting more attention this year, according to Mike Sena, president of the National Fusion Center Association, which represents state-run “fusion centers” staffed by federal, state and local public safety personnel who monitor threats and facilitate information sharing.

“We have always had threats during the national election cycles from violent extremists, including terrorist organizations,” he said. “With current events, it is more in the spotlight than ever.”

The Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, a bipartisan think tank, said in a June report that the outcome of the election could incite violence by the far-right or far-left.

“If President Trump loses the election, some extremists may use violence because they believe – however incorrectly – that there was fraud or that the election of Democratic candidate Joe Biden will undermine their extremist objectives,” the report reads. “Alternatively, some on the far-left could resort to terrorism if President Trump is re-elected.”

  Think about the above.  The ones not accepting a vote by the people is the right.   They wont accept any reality in which they don’t win everything.  What are they 3 year olds?   So much for democracy.   Hugs

9 thoughts on “U.S. intelligence reports warn of extremist threat around election

  • Scottie, I think last night’s debate, so to speak, confirmed what many already knew. Donald Trump is the greatest threat to our democracy more so than any terrorist group. Keith

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hello Keith. tRump clearly showed his true colors, and what he thinks is important in his world. He made clear his second and eternal term would be about enshrining racist views into fabric of our society while protecting and enriching himself. Hugs


  • I’m developing eye twitches when I listen to Dump for too long, so I couldn’t even try to watch the debate last night, because I also knew if they didn’t have a way to cut his mic, it was gonna be a crapfest. They need that at the moderator table for EVERY freaking debate, no matter who is up there.

    What startles me the most is the more I see Dump, the more I notice that at least 98% of all the 5-10 year old students (including those with behavioral issues) that I’ve tutored has acted more mature than Dump.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Hello Chatty Introvert. Yes very true. One thing is tRump has been use to never being told no or disagreed with his entire life. So it was a huge surprise to him that Chris Wallace tried. He figured it would go like his news briefings where he runs rough shod over reporters and everyone in the room. Hugs

      Liked by 1 person

      • Several have criticized Wallace for not having more control of the debate … and perhaps he could have done better … but the fact he continued to call out Trump on some of his asinine comments warmed my heart!

        Liked by 1 person

        • I was impressed that he’s like “no, we’re not going to skip this, it needs to be answered.” That was a good thing. I can’t think of a moderator that could’ve contained him and shut him up in those circumstances, though.

          Some nominees for the next moderator that I’ve seen floating around are Samuel L. Jackson (oh, that would be awesome) or Judge Judy. I never really watched her much, got annoyed at the yelling, but hell, I would that night! Would be great to see him get a verbal smackdown from a little woman like her (ha!)

          Liked by 1 person

            • gah! never mind. Should’ve figured that. Loudmouths flocking together and all.

              Dang, probably rules out R. Lee Ermey (was hoping he could go drill sergeant on his rear, if he’s still around).

              Okay, so down to the awesome S.L.J., maybe The Rock (that would work). Vin Diesel’s baritone could cut through the whiny treble in Dump’s voice.
              Just find an a-political marine drill sergeant that’s all about getting recruits to follow orders in rapid time. And maybe he could make ’em drop and give 5 if they mess up (don’t think Dump’s frame would allow for 10 without a heart attack) and let the other one talk.

              Liked by 1 person

        • Hello Nan. I agree with you. Ron and I disagreed on how much Wallace could have done, after all tRump is the president so he can not walk over and slap him.

          Ron felt Wallace should have stopped the debate, just shut it down. I disagreed, I don’t think Wallace had that authority.

          At one point Wallace said he was sorry for raising his voice, well that is the softest rising your voice I have heard. But again it is bad business to yell at the president. Hugs

          Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.