4 thoughts on “Supreme Court Justice: Coronavirus Mask Mandates Have Infringed Liberty

  1. randy November 14, 2020 / 09:04

    Hi Scottie;
    It’s a bit startling to hear anything from a USSC Justice. What has happened? How is it that these people feel they suddenly need to be in front of a camera? Put one damned fool wanna be media star in the white house and the whole town goes nuts.
    The things I wanted you to see are some of his other comments regarding civil liberties/protections for LGBTQ.

    And, could someone in the EPA please check the water in Washington DC ?? It seems to be infected with dumbshit.

    Hugs, very irritated and a bit nervous of idiots in power hugs,

    Liked by 3 people

    • Scottie November 14, 2020 / 16:19

      Hello Brother. Sorry I have been shy in our talks, I really have been not feeling well. But the last couple days I am feeling better.

      I know things are hectic for you but I hope you are taking some time for your self.

      As far as the Justice speech, it is very scary as far as a religious take over of the government and legal system of the US. Individual liberty must give way to religious belief in their minds. God’s kingdom’s comes first. Barrett wrote her entire reason for a legal career was to establish gods kingdom on earth. Screw the rest of us who do not follow their god.

      As an openly gay man who believes in a progressive modern way to live is the best way for people to move forward, these justices desire to regress to a time when religions ruled the entirely of human life is very scary. What bothers me is the many failed flawed humans who agree with this. Hugs

      Liked by 1 person

    • cagjr November 14, 2020 / 18:07

      I think nobody believes these people rule with fairness and equity. There is no way Alito or any other Justice can openly express those views and maintain any credibility. There is no way this man can uphold the Constitution. Setting aside the Constitution in favor of The Laws of God is a direct violation of their oath.

      …”but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”
      Article VI

      “The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

      The Constitutional oath:
      “I, _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

      The Judicial oath:
      “I, _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

      The fourth federal law, 18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.

      The Supreme Court is employed by the citizens of the U. S. The justices are subject to the constitution as well as all administrative offices. It may be a lifetime appointment but it is not immune from the impeachment process.

      What is the sin of being Progressive?
      · Progressive definition, favoring or advocating progress, change, improvement, or reform, as opposed to wishing to maintain things as they are, especially in political matters

      What is the sin of Regression?
      Political repression is the act of a state entity controlling a citizenry by force for political reasons, particularly for the purpose of restricting or preventing the citizenry’s ability to take part in the political life of a society, thereby reducing their standing among their fellow citizens.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Keith November 14, 2020 / 09:17

    Scottie, I sent this note to my newspaper and a couple of others. Feel free to adapt and send. Note, my brother-in-law used a more colorful metaphor that I omitted about wearing a mask. Keith

    “While the promise of a vaccine being available to many in the spring is good news, the rise in COVID-19 cases and deaths is troubling. Hearing the term “mobile mortuaries” is alarming by itself. Seeing folks still without masks and not socially distancing is disturbing, especially with family in retail and restaurants. As my Air Force veteran brother-in-law wrote, “it is not like we are being asked to storm the beaches at Normandy; please wear a mask and socially distance.” It truly is the least we could do to help others.”

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.