Far-Right Groups Raise Millions Via Christian Funding Site

The far-right can easily be associated with Christian fundamentalism. This can be seen in many contexts, from the Ku Klux Klan to the Proud Boys and this latest example of fundraising. I say “latest” because, last year, Christians raised inordinate amounts of money for right-w9ing shooter Kyle Rittenhouse.

The Guardian reports:

A data breach from Christian crowdfunding site GiveSendGo has revealed that millions of dollars have been raised on the site for far-right causes and groups, many of whom are banned from raising funds on other platforms.


It also identifies previously anonymous high-dollar donors to far-right actors, some of whom enjoy positions of wealth, power or public responsibility.

Some of the biggest beneficiaries have been members of groups such as the Proud Boys, designated as a terrorist group in Canada, many of whose fundraising efforts were directly related to the 6 January attack on the United States Capitol.

The breach, shared with journalists by transparency group Distributed Denial of Secrets, shows the site was used for a wide range of legitimate charitable purposes, such as crowdfunding medical bills, aid projects and religious missions.

Across at least 11 crowdfunding campaigns associated with the Proud Boys, members of the group, including some now facing conspiracy charges related to the Capitol attack, raised over $375,000. Some of these fundraisers netted large amounts of money in a short period.

After the Proud Boys chairman, Enrique Tarrio, was arrested on 4 January on charges related to firearms and the vandalism of a black church at a previous rally, a fundraiser billed as a “defense fund” made $113,000 in just four days.

A large proportion of that money came from a number of high-dollar donors who elected to be anonymous on the website, but whose identifying details were nevertheless preserved by GiveSendGo.

The anonymous donations included $1,000 from an email address associated with Gabe Carrera, a Florida-based personal injury lawyer who bills himself as the attorney who rides. Another $1,000 which came to Tarrio was associated with an email address belonging to Paul C Gill, a Honolulu-based Hawaiian Airlines employee and former pilot who has previously made donations to Donald Trump’s campaigns and to the Republican party, and who has offered public political commentary in the form of letters to the editor in local newspapers.

Of Tarrio’s donors, none immediately responded to requests for comment except for Gerardo G Gonzalez, who anonymously donated $1,000 to Tarrio on 7 January.

Public records show that Florida-based Gonzalez is a former pharmacist who owns at least six properties in Miami Beach and Homestead, Florida. His apartments, apartment buildings and an acreage lot have an assessed value in excess of $2.4m, and in prior decades has sold other properties worth millions more.

In a telephone conversation, Gonzalez said that his support of the Proud Boys was motivated by his belief that “there is no systemic racism in this country”, and his opposition to “BLM and Antifa” who he said represented “the real extremism” in the United States. He also used derogatory terms for Latinos and Democrats.

Other Proud Boy fundraisers raised large amounts, and attracted a similar range of high-value anonymous donations.

Following the Capitol riots, a fundraiser in the name of “Medical Assistance to DC Proud Boy victims” made $106,107 on just 6 and 7 January. One anonymous donation for $5,000 was associated with an email address belonging to Ou Yin Lu, a Hacienda Heights, California, resident and businesswoman who had previously donated $14,640 to Trump’s campaign funds, the Republican National Committee and a former California state representative Bob Huff during the 2020 campaign funding cycle.

Also, after charges were laid on the Proud Boys organizer Joe Biggs for his alleged role in the Capitol attack, an anonymous donation for $1,000 came from an email address belonging to a New York woman whose social media accounts list her as a state-employed special education teacher. Overall, Biggs raised over $6,000 on the site.

So on and so forth.

Daily morning cartoon / meme roundup: We are in a race to get enough people vaccinated before a variant is created that the vaccines can not handle. Don’t give up on precautions yet, we still need each other to be responsible.

Hello everyone.   Sundays are the worst days for political cartoons.  I have 115 bookmarked web sites I check for cartoons and today was very slim picking.   Most all the political ones were posted already this week.   So I filled in with other cartoons.   Be well and I hope you have a great wonderful enjoyable day.  Hugs

Matt Davies Comic Strip for April 11, 2021

Kevin Necessary Editorial Cartoons Comic Strip for April 10, 2021

Clay Jones Comic Strip for April 11, 2021

Knocking while

Got what they deserved

Walt Handelsman Comic Strip for April 10, 2021

Anyone noticed

Darth Cheney

Foam milk


Steve Breen Comic Strip for April 11, 2021

Doonesbury Comic Strip for April 11, 2021

Looking at you

sideways bride

Grasping at straws

Non Sequitur Comic Strip for April 11, 2021

Free Range Comic Strip for April 11, 2021

Working It Out Comic Strip for April 11, 2021

Wizard of Id Comic Strip for April 11, 2021

Close to Home Comic Strip for April 11, 2021

For Better or For Worse Comic Strip for April 11, 2021

White nationalists praise Tucker Carlson’s full embrace of their “replacement” conspiracy theory


On the April 8 broadcast of Fox News Primetime, Tucker Carlson offered perhaps his most explicit justification yet for the core belief of the so-called “great replacement” conspiracy theory, telling viewers that “Third World” invaders are coming to replace them and reshape their environment, and that they should do something about it.

After the Anti-Defamation League called on Fox News to fire Carlson for his remarks, white supremacist and far-right personalities were quick to make their approval known.

White supremacist and Holocaust denier Nick Fuentes explained what Carlson actually meant in his statements, lamenting that Carlson wasn’t more direct and theorizing that he probably had to dial it back in order to avoid consequences at Fox.

Nick Fuentes Tucker Carlson Great Replacement

Other racist and extreme far-right media personalities and social media accounts also backed Carlson, celebrating him for broadcasting “what nationalists have been talking about for decades” and defending him against criticism.

Way of The World on Twitter
Columbia Bugle on Twitter
Scott Greer on Twitter
Liberty Hangout on Twitter
Mike Peinovich via Telegram

Various Telegram accounts associated with white supremacists movements and the far-right

Telegram user reacts to ADl's condemnation of Carlson
Telegram celebrates Carlson's comments
4Chan reacts to Tucker
4Chan reacts to Tucker
4Chan reacts to Tucker

Can there be any doubt now about what Fox News, and the right want?   The right wing media has been pushing this agenda for decades.   Before that we had other means they distributed it with just printed paper.  I remember a guy I knew who lived near us in WPB who would leave a print out his friends printed on our doorstep.  It was full of the local news and especially the police blotter with the most hateful incorrect descriptions and venomous  langage.   The most racist garbage you could imagine.   Once we found out who was doing it we put a stop to it.   But this guy was a world traveler, had money, was at one time someone in the entertainment industry and well known to the wealthy social community.   And his views were repugnant.  He once went off on a black mail delivery person because he accused her of stepping off the sidewalk to his house onto his lawn before delivering his mail.   Hearing the yelling I went out and got involved, to back her up if anything came of it.   Afterwards he wanted to have words with me, that ended quickly and decisively as you may imagine.   He never spoke to Ron and I again as long as we lived there and we did not mind at all.  Hugs

‘Clear the Capitol,’ Pence pleaded, timeline of riot shows


From a secure room in the Capitol on Jan. 6, as rioters pummeled police and vandalized the building, Vice President Mike Pence tried to assert control. In an urgent phone call to the acting defense secretary, he issued a startling demand.

“Clear the Capitol,” Pence said.

Elsewhere in the building, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi were making a similarly dire appeal to military leaders, asking the Army to deploy the National Guard.

“We need help,” Schumer, D-N.Y., said in desperation, more than an hour after the Senate chamber had been breached.

At the Pentagon, officials were discussing media reports that the mayhem was not confined to Washington and that other state capitals were facing similar violence in what had the makings of a national insurrection.

“We must establish order,” said Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in a call with Pentagon leaders.

But order would not be restored for hours.

These new details about the deadly riot are contained in a previously undisclosed document prepared by the Pentagon for internal use that was obtained by The Associated Press and vetted by current and former government officials.

The timeline adds another layer of understanding about the state of fear and panic while the insurrection played out, and lays bare the inaction by then-President Donald Trump and how that void contributed to a slowed response by the military and law enforcement. It shows that the intelligence missteps, tactical errors and bureaucratic delays were eclipsed by the government’s failure to comprehend the scale and intensity of a violent uprising by its own citizens.

With Trump not engaged, it fell to Pentagon officials, a handful of senior White House aides, the leaders of Congress and the vice president holed up in a secure bunker to manage the chaos.

While the timeline helps to crystalize the frantic character of the crisis, the document, along with hours of sworn testimony, provides only an incomplete picture about how the insurrection could have advanced with such swift and lethal force, interrupting the congressional certification of Joe Biden as president and delaying the peaceful transfer of power, the hallmark of American democracy.

Lawmakers, protected to this day by National Guard troops, will hear from the inspector general of the Capitol Police this coming week.

“Any minute that we lost, I need to know why,” Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., chair of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, which is investigating the siege, said last month.

The timeline fills in some of those gaps.

At 4:08 p.m. on Jan. 6, as the rioters roamed the Capitol and after they had menacingly called out for Pelosi, D-Calif., and yelled for Pence to be hanged, the vice president was in a secure location, phoning Christopher Miller, the acting defense secretary, and demanding answers.

There had been a highly public rift between Trump and Pence, with Trump furious that his vice president refused to halt the Electoral College certification. Interfering with that process was an act that Pence considered unconstitutional. The Constitution makes clear that the vice president’s role in this joint session of Congress is largely ceremonial.

Pence’s call to Miller lasted only a minute. Pence said the Capitol was not secure and he asked military leaders for a deadline for securing the building, according to the document.

By this point it had already been two hours since the mob overwhelmed Capitol Police unprepared for an insurrection. Rioters broke into the building, seized the Senate and paraded to the House. In their path, they left destruction and debris. Dozens of officers were wounded, some gravely.

Just three days earlier, government leaders had talked about the use of the National Guard. On the afternoon of Jan. 3, as lawmakers were sworn in for the new session of Congress, Miller and Milley gathered with Cabinet members to discuss Jan. 6. They also met with Trump.

In that meeting at the White House, Trump approved the activation of the D.C. National Guard and also told the acting defense secretary to take whatever action needed as events unfolded, according to the information obtained by the AP.

The next day, Jan. 4, the defense officials spoke by phone with Cabinet members, including the acting attorney general, and finalized details of the Guard deployment.

The Guard’s role was limited to traffic intersections and checkpoints around the city, based in part on strict restrictions mandated by district officials. Miller also authorized Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy to deploy, if needed, the D.C. Guard’s emergency reaction force stationed at Joint Base Andrews.

The Trump administration and the Pentagon were wary of a heavy military presence, in part because of criticism officials faced for the seemingly heavy-handed National Guard and law enforcement efforts to counter civil unrest in the aftermath of the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis.

In particular, the D.C. Guard’s use of helicopters to hover over crowds in downtown Washington during those demonstrations drew widespread criticism. That unauthorized move prompted the Pentagon to more closely control the D.C. Guard.

“There was a lot of things that happened in the spring that the department was criticized for,” Robert Salesses, who is serving as the assistant defense secretary for homeland defense and global security, said at a congressional hearing last month.

On the eve of Trump’s rally Jan. 6 near the White House, the first 255 National Guard troops arrived in the district, and Mayor Muriel Bowser confirmed in a letter to the administration that no other military support was needed.

By the morning of Jan. 6, crowds started gathering at the Ellipse before Trump’s speech. According to the Pentagon’s plans, the acting defense secretary would only be notified if the crowd swelled beyond 20,000.

Before long it was clear that the crowd was far more in control of events than the troops and law enforcement there to maintain order.

Trump, just before noon, was giving his speech and he told supporters to march to the Capitol. The crowd at the rally was at least 10,000. By 1:15 p.m., the procession was well on its way there.

As protesters reached the Capitol grounds, some immediately became violent, busting through weak police barriers in front of the building and beating up officers who stood in their way.

At 1:49 p.m., as the violence escalated, then- Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund called Maj. Gen. William Walker, commanding general of the D.C. National Guard, to request assistance.

Sund’s voice was “cracking with emotion,” Walker later told a Senate committee. Walker immediately called Army leaders to inform them of the request.

Twenty minutes later, around 2:10 p.m., the first rioters were beginning to break through the doors and windows of the Senate. They then started a march through the marbled halls in search of the lawmakers who were counting the electoral votes. Alarms inside the building announced a lockdown.

Sund frantically called Walker again and asked for at least 200 guard members “and to send more if they are available.”

But even with the advance Cabinet-level preparation, no help was immediately on the way.

Over the next 20 minutes, as senators ran to safety and the rioters broke into the chamber and rifled through their desks, Army Secretary McCarthy spoke with the mayor and Pentagon leaders about Sund’s request.

On the Pentagon’s third floor E Ring, senior Army leaders were huddled around the phone for what they described as a “panicked” call from the D.C. Guard. As the gravity of the situation became clear, McCarthy bolted from the meeting, sprinting down the hall to Miller’s office and breaking into a meeting.

As minutes ticked by, rioters breached additional entrances in the Capitol and made their way to the House. They broke glass in doors that led to the chamber and tried to gain entry as a group of lawmakers was still trapped inside.

At 2:25 p.m., McCarthy told his staff to prepare to move the emergency reaction force to the Capitol. The force could be ready to move in 20 minutes.

At 2:44 p.m., Trump supporter Ashli Babbitt was fatally shot by a Capitol Police officer as she tried to climb through a window that led to the House floor.

Shortly after 3 p.m., McCarthy provided “verbal approval” of the activation of 1,100 National Guard troops to support the D.C. police and the development of a plan for the troops’ deployment duties, locations and unit sizes.

Minutes later the Guard’s emergency reaction force left Joint Base Andrews for the D.C. Armory. There, they would prepare to head to the Capitol once Miller, the acting defense secretary, gave final approval.

Meanwhile, the Joint Staff set up a video teleconference call that stayed open until about 10 p.m. that night, allowing staff to communicate any updates quickly to military leaders.

At 3:19 p.m., Pelosi and Schumer were calling the Pentagon for help and were told the National Guard had been approved.

But military and law enforcement leaders struggled over the next 90 minutes to execute the plan as the Army and Guard called all troops in from their checkpoints, issued them new gear, laid out a new plan for their mission and briefed them on their duties.

The Guard troops had been prepared only for traffic duties. Army leaders argued that sending them into a volatile combat situation required additional instruction to keep both them and the public safe.

By 3:37 p.m., the Pentagon sent its own security forces to guard the homes of defense leaders. No troops had yet reached the Capitol.

By 3:44 p.m., the congressional leaders escalated their pleas.

“Tell POTUS to tweet everyone should leave,” Schumer implored the officials, using the acronym for the president of the United States. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., asked about calling up active duty military.

At 3:48 p.m., frustrated that the D.C. Guard hadn’t fully developed a plan to link up with police, the Army secretary dashed from the Pentagon to D.C. police headquarters to help coordinate with law enforcement.

Trump broke his silence at 4:17 p.m., tweeting to his followers to “go home and go in peace.”

By about 4:30 p.m., the military plan was finalized and Walker had approval to send the Guard to the Capitol. The reports of state capitals breached in other places turned out to be bogus.

At about 4:40 p.m. Pelosi and Schumer were again on the phone with Milley and the Pentagon leadership, asking Miller to secure the perimeter.

But the acrimony was becoming obvious.

The congressional leadership on the call “accuses the National Security apparatus of knowing that protestors planned to conduct an assault on the Capitol,” the timeline said.

The call lasts 30 minutes. Pelosi’s spokesman acknowledges there was a brief discussion of the obvious intelligence failures that led to the insurrection.

It would be another hour before the first contingent of 155 Guard members were at the Capitol. Dressed in riot gear, they began arriving at 5:20 p.m.

They started moving out the rioters, but there were few, if any, arrests. by police.

At 8 p.m. the Capitol was declared secure.

Transgender name ban advances


Bill would deny kids say on identity by Frank E. LockwoodRachel Herzog | Today at 7:04 a.m.
“This bill is just a first step to help protect our teachers but when we have students in school now that don’t identify as a boy or a girl but as a cat, as a furry, we have issues,” Rep. Mary Bentley (shown) said Thursday in presenting her bill that would require public school employees to address students only by the name and sex designated on the student’s birth certificate. (Arkansas Democrat-Gazette/Thomas Metthe)

Arkansas teachers wouldn’t be required to address students by a name or pronoun inconsistent with the student’s biological sex under proposed legislation that passed Thursday in the House, one of the latest of several measures in the state Legislature that human-rights advocates say targets transgender people.

The vote on House Bill 1749 came two days after lawmakers prohibited hormone treatments, puberty blockers and transition-related surgeries for transgender minors.

Gov. Asa Hutchinson, who vetoed the bill only to see it overridden by Republican supermajorities, faced sharp criticism again Thursday afternoon, this time from former President Donald Trump.

In a written statement, the one-term president accused the two-term governor of being a “RINO” — a Republican in Name Only. A spokesman for the state Republican Party rejected the assertion.


Lawmakers who opposed HB1749, as well as LGBT-rights advocates, say it protects teachers who intentionally misgender students who are transgender, which sponsor Rep. Mary Bentley, R-Perryville, has acknowledged would be the case.


The House’s 62-21 vote, which was mostly along party lines, sends the measure to the Senate. Two lawmakers voted present, and 14 didn’t vote. Two Republicans, Rep. Frances Cavenaugh of Walnut Ridge and Rep. Jeff Wardlaw of Hermitage, voted no, and Rep. Spencer Hawks, R-Conway, was excused.

Hutchinson has expressed concerns about the latest proposal.

“This bill is unnecessary,” he said in a written statement Thursday. “I am requesting my Department of Education to further evaluate.”

Bentley said some teachers had raised concerns to her about students who have changed their name or pronoun several times in a year, or use three different names in as many classrooms, and fear that they’ll be sued for not addressing the child by their preferred name or pronoun.

“It’s not compelling anyone’s speech. It’s not prohibiting anyone’s speech. It’s helping those professors and teachers in our schools that do not want to be sued for not using a certain person’s pronoun,” Bentley said.

Two Democratic lawmakers, Rep. Fred Love of Little Rock and Rep. Megan Godfrey of Springdale, spoke against the bill.

Love said intentionally not referring to someone by what they want to be called is “one of the most disrespectful things that you can do.

“That’s one of the simplest decencies that we can give someone. … That’s not hard. That’s not difficult. That’s just a bit of decency and a bit of respect and I think that’s what we need to do,” Love said.

Rep. Mark Lowery, R-Maumelle, spoke for the bill and mentioned a situation at the residential Arkansas School for Mathematics, Sciences and the Arts, where a “male student who wanted to be called by a female name” was voluntarily referred to that way by teachers, but administrators were instructed to refer to the student by the student’s given name when talking to the child’s parents.

Lowery said “not letting a parent know what their own child is going through shows that we have a problem.”

“This bill does not specifically address the example I’m giving you but it does put a spotlight on the fact that it is something that needs to be addressed, and so I think that a good starting point would be to vote for this bill,” Lowery said.

Godfrey said, “There’s nothing more critical than a positive relationship between a student and a teacher, especially kind of at those adolescent grades” with regard to student achievement.

She said teachers who intentionally misgender students are severing that vital relationship.

Bentley said schools should do more to address things like students changing their name between classes or identifying as an animal.

“We have a real issue in our state, and I need our districts to take a look at this and do more than this bill does,” Bentley said. “This bill is just a first step to help protect our teachers but when we have students in school now that don’t identify as a boy or a girl but as a cat, as a furry, we have issues.”

Some members of the House Education Committee said Tuesday that those concerns weren’t something they’d heard from teachers.

In response to a question from committee member Rep. Charlene Fite, R-Van Buren, Bentley said no teacher had been sued for not using a student’s preferred name or pronoun in Arkansas as of Tuesday.

Richelle Brittain, a recent graduate of the University of Arkansas at Little Rock’s William H. Bowen School of Law who is transgender, said at Tuesday’s committee meeting that the bill violates Title IX as interpreted by President Joe Biden’s administration. An executive order that Biden signed last month states that discrimination on the basis of sex includes discrimination based on gender identity.

“This bill targets trans kids. It is aimed at protecting intentional misgendering of our kids,” Brittain said.

Bentley said in committee that a student’s biological sex would be determined by the registration forms submitted at the beginning of the school year, which don’t include a space for preferred pronouns.

The bill doesn’t specify that schools would determine a student’s biological sex based on the form, but Bentley said she would be happy to amend the legislation to do so on the Senate side.


HB1749 is one of several measures passed by or advancing in the Arkansas Legislature that are seen as targeting transgender individuals.

Act 461, which the governor signed into law in March, would ban schools from allowing transgender girls and women from participating on the sports teams aligning with their gender identity.

House Bill 1882, which was filed this week, would allow government entities to be sued for permitting a person to use a restroom designated for a sex different from the sex a person was assigned at birth.

House Bill 1570, the ban on gender-affirming treatment for transgender minors, was enacted Tuesday when the Legislature voted to override Hutchinson’s veto.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson subsequently criticized Hutchinson for opposing the bill, suggesting — without offering any evidence — that the governor was acting at the behest of Walmart or the Walton family.

The Walton Family Foundation, he noted, had backed Hutchinson’s decision.

In a written statement posted Tuesday on its website, Tom Walton, the foundation’s home region program committee chairman, had voiced alarm about “the string of policy targeting LGBTQ people in Arkansas.”

“This trend is harmful and sends the wrong message to those willing to invest in or visit our state,” the grandson of Walmart founder Sam Walton had written.

“We support Gov. Asa Hutchinson’s recent veto of discriminatory policy and implore government, business and community leaders to consider the impact of existing and future policy that limits basic freedoms and does not promote inclusiveness in our communities and economy,” he wrote.

On his program Wednesday, Carlson suggested Hutchinson hopes to one day serve on the Bentonville-based retailer’s board.

In a written statement Thursday, Hutchinson said Carlson’s comments were false.

“It is irresponsible for Tucker Carlson to make baseless claims without any evidence or truth to back them up,” Hutchinson said.

“If I have been offered any corporate board seats then please let me know because that is news to me. Let me be clear, I have almost two years left as Governor of this great state and that is my focus,” he said.

“In terms of my decision making as Governor, I am not influenced by any pressure other than the weight of my convictions and the concern I have for the people of Arkansas,” he said.

The veto also drew fire from Trump.

“Asa Hutchinson, the lightweight RINO Governor of Arkansas, just vetoed a Bill that banned the CHEMICAL CASTRATION OF CHILDREN,” Trump said in a written statement released Thursday.

“‘Bye-bye Asa,'” that’s the end of him!,” the former president wrote. “Fortunately for the Great State of Arkansas, Sarah Huckabee Sanders will do a fantastic job as your next Governor!”

In a written statement, Hutchinson shrugged off Trump’s criticism.

“Forty years ago when I started my fight to build the Republican Party of Arkansas I was called ‘a right wing extremist.’ I was simply a conservative then and remain a conservative now,” he said. “Today, as then, I am less concerned about monikers and more concerned about principle and the direction of our nation. Our party was built upon ideas, civil rights, individual liberty and restraints on government. Hopefully, we can debate our ideas with respect and through civil discourse.”

In a text message, Sanders would not say whether she shared Trump’s view of Hutchinson, but voiced support for the bill he vetoed.

“I believe in limited government, but there is a role for us to protect those who can’t protect themselves, especially children, which is why this law is important and I support it,” she wrote.

Hutchinson, while supporting Trump’s reelection bid, broke with the president after it became clear that Democrat Joe Biden had won.

He opposed efforts to overturn the decision of the Electoral College, and said Trump bears “a great deal of responsibility, key responsibility, for what happened at our nation’s Capitol on January 6.”

Hutchinson has also said he would not support a Trump presidential bid in 2024.

Republican Party of Arkansas spokesman Seth Mays dismissed allegations that Hutchinson is a RINO.

“That seems like a pretty hard claim to make,” he said, recalling Hutchinson’s service as an impeachment manager during the Senate trial of President Bill Clinton and his efforts, as state party chairman, to ensure that the state would pay for Republican primary elections.

“The state of Arkansas literally has Republican primaries, because the Republican Party of Arkansas, under its then-chairman Asa Hutchinson sued the state of Arkansas for the state to pay for primaries, [maintaining] that they were not an expense of the party. So that seems like a pretty hard claim to make.”

Rep. Megan Godfrey (shown) said the bill would sever the vital positive relationship between a student and a teacher.
(Arkansas Democrat-Gazette/Thomas Metthe)
Rep. Megan Godfrey (shown) said the bill would sever the vital positive relationship between a student and a teacher. (Arkansas Democrat-Gazette/Thomas Metthe)

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story listed an incorrect bill number. House Bill 1570 is the ban on gender-affirming treatment for transgender minors.

Misinformation, misdirection, and lies

I am amazed at the amount of right wing cartoonist / media that seem to deliberately misconstrue and distort what Biden is trying to do, the legislation to make things better in the US, and to bring the US in to the 21st century to compete with other advanced  nations.   All because of the idea that the government should serve the wants of the wealthy upper class which the elected officials are members of, but never work for or help the lower incomes average people of the country.   This is all so the wealthy can increase their wealth more, the poor will get more in a desperate situation.  The want to create a third world banana republic where they control everything, have everything, and the people are just their servants to use and dispose of when they are no more use.  But it is the disinformation, the lies they spew and draw that makes me wonder their motives.    Hugs

As for the situation on the border, so many attempts by the right to make this a new problem.   They seem to forget this surge happens every two years about.   Remember these people have to travel by foot and other lower income slow means.   Remember most are running for their lives and safety, not just to work for a better living, and yes the ones that want to work for a better living are important also.  Biden has not changed the rules, even though he has tried.   He is still operating under the rules tRump put in place because tRump made it really hard to change his asinine polices and the Republican Ag’s like Paxton of Texas who is indicted for his own crimes have vowed to sue everything Biden tries to do on the border to make things better.   Yes the Republican do not want things better, because they would rather have an issue they can bash the Democrats with than help the people living in those horrible conditions.    Biden is trying to make things better by opening up better and larger facilities.    Biden is still using the send everyone back because of Covid policy that tRump people implemented.   The US is by law and treaty required to admit and process the people asking for asylum, and so Biden has asked for more resources to process them rather than jail them.  Why put able body people who are willing and want to work in jail to wait for several years to get a hearing.  We need more judges and staff to process the people which could cut the time down to a reasonable few months.    Also the huge issue is the housing of minors.   They are coming, they are here, and they need to be treated as the children they are.   Children!  So they can not be dropped off at a bus station in Mexico nor in the US as tRump was doing with adults.    The ICE detention centers are not designed or big enough to hold them and ICE shouldn’t be holding kids.   So Biden has asked Fema to step in and help provide housing and structure for these kids.  

Border misinformationCome on man misinformation

joe at the border

I nearly choked on my morning coffee when I read the stories of the Republicans so righteously complaining  that Biden was giving housing to “them illegals foreigner  while letting our valiant warriors struggle to live while homeless”.  Oh woe the military members who struggle to live in dignity under Biden, who has been president for a few months.   Meanwhile the Republicans had the White House for the last four years, the Senate for the last four years, and the House for two.    What did they do for the veterans?   Nothing!  They slashed the VA budgets while spending lavishly on new defense programs for weapons and wars.   In fact the Covid America Rescue Plan that Biden put forward and the Democrats passed had money to help homeless veterans among other funds for helping veterans and the homeless both.   The Democrats did this!   Not one Republican voted for it!   Not one Republican voted to give money to help homeless veterans get help.   So Republicans can shut up until they put up.   This is the New Republican way, vote against anything that helps people but take credit for it if people like it, or rail against the problem that they refused to help fix.

Homeless vets

Misinformation 3

These angered me because it is an attempt by Republicans to hide their bigotry while claiming that the legislation would increase something that is not happening now.    The big lie is that that election fraud in an amount to change elections has happened.   It never has in my life time and I am an old @#@#@.   tRump did not lose because there was that much election fraud,  He lost because 8 million more people voted for Biden.   That is why the Republicans do not want “those” people to vote, they did not vote for their guy.   The minor fraud that was found in every investigation was done by Republicans for tRump!   The reason is Democrats value democracy and the idea of the right to vote.   We want everyone who is eligible to vote.   We would like to stop restricting other wise eligible from voting.   One person one vote.   The reason is that Democrats are willing to appeal to the people and work to get their votes.   Republicans do not care for democracy.   They want power because power increases their wealth.   Because they wont appeal to the people nor work to win their votes, they have decided they don’t want people to vote.   They want to rule,  they want to force people to live as they say rather than do what the people ask. 

election law misinformation

This again is pure misdirection and misinformation.     The public supports people needing verification to vote.   So do Democrats.   However Republicans have written laws that require identification that people who normally vote Democratic are less likely to have.   Why is a college ID not a valid ID but an NRA card is?   People who live in cities tend to vote more Democratic, and people who live in big cites tend not to drive their own cars, so they do not have drivers licenses.   In some states older people have trouble getting a drivers license or state ID.   If they live in the country they have to travel a distance when they do not drive to a place to get a card, and then they have to produce identification that they may not be able to get.   What this is designed to do is to add more steps to vote, to use the right to vote.   These are people who all their lives have voted before these new laws to stop them, they are citizens, they have a legal right to vote that the Republicans are trying to take a way.   If the Republicans want people to have a set ID for voting they need to make that ID easily available and at no cost.   Help the people get the ID’s the Republicans want people to use for their right to vote.  Restrictions to rights should happen rarely and for real problems.   Republicans losing elections is not a real problem.   These laws restricting voting, making voting harder is a bigoted attempt to find a problem to hang their racism on.   If you think this is not racism why is the restrictions always aimed at making it harder for POC and other minorities like Native Indians to vote, but makes it easier for older white people to vote?   Yes it is racism. 

No pappers needed

HR 1 banana republic

The idea that raising the tax rate is going to tank the economy and cause corporations to flee the country is a joke.   It is not true and wont happen.   This is brought to you by the same people that have for 40 years told you that if you keep giving more and more money to the wealthy the economy will soar as that wealth trickles down to you.    The wealth never reaches you at the bottom does it?   It was a lie designed to make the wealthy richer and you poorer.   So stop believing those same Republicans now.   The fact is the country and the economy has historically done much better when the wealthy and corporations paid a lot more.   It makes sense.   The wealthy and the corporations can afford to pay more, the burden doesn’t harm them.  However when the burden was shifted to the lower incomes and poor they suffer hardships as they do not have the resources to pay for everything.   That gives Republicans the joy of calling for even more cuts to services that help the lower incomes, while again claiming they need to give more money the wealthy to fix a problem created by doing just that.   Also look around the world.   Every country that taxes the wealthy and corporations have more services for the people, have higher ratings, and still have wealthy and corporations that did not flee.  Don’t buy into the fearmongering, but instead look around, open your eyes to what is happening around the world.    The US is falling farther behind in almost every measure now.   We are far from #1 in anything but military spending.   Other countries are putting money into schools for their people, into medical care for their people, into infrastructure for the people, reusable energy, electric cars and charging stations among many improvements.   China is accelerating research in to reusable energy to corner the market.   The US use to be the world leader, but that was when businesses and the wealthy paid their share of the burden instead of demanding all the money of the country be in their pockets.   Also the same people that loved no bid give away contracts worth millions and billions during the tRump years suddenly have a problem with well targeted spending plans and want to pretend that spending on things that help the people and make life better for the average person is feeding the swamp.   Get real.   There is no comparison between what tRump / Republicans did and what the Biden team is doing now.  

Biden tax increase

Swamp feedings

This is a desperate ploy

Really, less regulation on the food we eat?   Look the facts are that some country wont even let US dairy and meat products be sold in their countries because the US standards are so poor.    There is things in our food that turn my stomach if I think too hard on it.   It doesn’t have to be a game of truth or dare to eat.    Our food and water needs to be safe to eat and drink.   But years of lower standards have made food, especially lower priced foods a gamble.   Do you want your meals with your family to be spent wondering if you or your loved ones will get sick from eating?  The Republicans want you to picture a loving caring big business that always does the right thing.  The truth is most business do what ever they can get away with to make money.  In fact officers of a publicly traded company have a federal duty to shareholders to make as much money as possible even if it does harm or hurts people.  Money is king by law.   So the laws, rules, and regulations have to be created to keep the money grab from being deadly or harmful to everyone.   Again it is normal in a developed nation to have rules and regulations, laws restraining the worst impulses of greed.    Is the US a developed advanced nation or a banana republic?  

Misinformation on meat regs

This one is 50/50.   I included it to show how each side can use the information to their advantage.   The money grubbing cooperate Republican DeSantis is well know for playing to the wealthy for money.   The money flows large in Palm Beach County for politicians.    DeSantis we to meet with some local government leaders, that is true.    However he met only with like minded Republican ones.   He left out the majority of the elected officials.   The ones he talked to were like himself and of course wanted to send as much business as possible to a private business rather than government workers.  There is money to be made dishing out vaccines.   So Publix got the deal and Desantis and possibly other local politicians got some also.   However many board members who were asked by 60 Minutes denied that they talked to DeSantis or would have wanted Publix to get the vaccine contract.   

sixty minutes myths story

Smear is not totally

Facts are important and I recommend people educate them selves on these and other issues instead of following a opinion host who makes millions spouting misinformation or is paid to cause confusion and rage by claiming wrongs where no exist.     Hugs